Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you've securely linked to the.gov site. Share delicate info just on official, secure websites.
- About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as proprietors and realty business as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other financing institutions and property owners insurance provider whose prejudiced practices make housing not available to individuals because of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises a problem of basic public importance. Where force or threat of force is used to reject or disrupt fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also supplies treatments for managing specific complaints of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of an unlawful housing practice, may submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of individuals based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
Among the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers try to camouflage their discrimination by providing false info about availability of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to certain areas based on race. Individuals who get such incorrect info or misdirection may have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought numerous cases declaring this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this type of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise declared that municipalities and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority communities, due to the fact that the potential residents were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a particular religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances created to limit making use of private homes as a locations of praise. The number of cases submitted because 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in comparison to some of the other forbidden bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does include a minimal exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a religious organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this area has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, especially those who are bad, and with minimal housing choices, typically have little option but to endure the embarrassment and degradation of sexual harassment or threat having their families and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on property managers who develop an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from occupants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to acquire relief for renters who have actually been dealt with unfairly by a proprietor because of sex and also hinder other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with consequences. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning may also negatively affect females, particularly minority women. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his/her ancestors come from. Census information suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our country's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus municipal governments that have actually attempted to reduce or limit the variety of Hispanic families that might live in their neighborhoods. We have actually sued loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually enforced more rigid underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has likewise taken legal action against lenders for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing diversity of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it versus private property managers who have victimized such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing against families with children under 18. In addition to restricting an outright denial of housing to households with children, the Act likewise prevents housing companies from imposing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of kids. For instance, landlords may not locate households with children in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable limitation on the overall variety of individuals who may live in a house, or limit their access to leisure services supplied to other tenants. In many instances, the amended Fair Housing Act forbids a housing supplier from refusing to rent or offer to households with children. However, some facilities may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which meets the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published regulations and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of impairment in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a disability to imply those people with mental or physical disabilities that significantly restrict one or more significant life activities. The term mental or physical problems may include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, movement impairment, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug dependency, chronic tiredness, discovering special needs, head injury, and psychological disease. The term significant life activity might include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, performing manual tasks, taking care of one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures persons who have a record of such a problems, or are considered as having such a disability. Current users of illegal regulated substances, persons founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex culprits, and juvenile culprits are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no defenses to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct danger to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody positions such a direct hazard should be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with specials needs has actually concentrated on 2 major locations. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other guidelines worrying land usage are not used to prevent the property options of these people, including needlessly limiting common, or gather, domestic plans, such as group homes. The 2nd area is insuring that newly built multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is available to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in particular, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against individuals with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with specials needs may cohabit in congregate living plans, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other local federal government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or implementing land usage policies that omit or otherwise discriminate against individuals with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To utilize land usage policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with impairments less positively than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation forbiding housing for persons with impairments or a particular type of impairment, such as psychological health problem, from locating in a particular location, while enabling other groups of unrelated individuals to live together in that area.
- To take action against, or reject a permit, for a home since of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building permit for a home due to the fact that it was meant to supply housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To decline to clear up accommodations in land use and zoning policies and procedures where such accommodations may be required to pay for persons or groups of individuals with disabilities a level playing field to use and delight in housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for adjustments of guidelines or policies are affordable. If a requested modification enforces an excessive monetary or administrative concern on a local government, or if an adjustment develops a basic change in a regional government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "sensible" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus persons with impairments to consist of a failure "to design and construct" specific new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with specials needs, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act requires all newly constructed multi-family homes of four or more systems planned for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific features: an available entryway on an accessible path, accessible typical and public usage locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, available routes into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable bathroom and kitchens set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building of brand-new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures stop working to fulfill these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been dealt with by approval decrees offering a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where possible and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building and construction requirements) that will offer making other housing systems accessible; training on the ease of access requirements for those associated with the construction procedure; a required that all brand-new housing tasks adhere to the ease of access requirements, and financial relief for those injured by the violations. In addition, the Department has actually looked for to promote availability through building regulations.
